research methods, 56:834:535:01
[current syllabus at https://theaok.github.io/res]
Fall 2024; Tue 6:00-8:50pm, ATG-201
Adam Okulicz-Kozaryn adam.okulicz.kozaryn@gmail.com
office: office hours: Tue, Thu 1-2, and by appointment: 321 cooper st
1st fl lab in the back
assistant:
Wei Chen wc642@camden.rutgers.edu
office: 321 Cooper St, Room 202 (2nd Floor); office hours: Thu 2-3, and by appointment
mission/philosophy
Do talk to me about challenges at the beginning! I can accommodate
much of it, if you tell me early!
I will treat research methods/skills extremely broadly in this class: you
can do research in great variety of ways!!
Everyone is different (especially in this class)!
Many ways to excel (eg opportunities for extra credit): some will excel
by doing math, statistical programming, doing civic
engagement, having great research ideas, if you are
motivated you will excel one way or the other! if you fail in one
area, you can make it up in another area!
course description
Data are everywhere: in public and private sectors, even in
academia. People and organizations need to be able to make sense of
data and understand others making sense of data.
This is a graduate introductory quantitative research methods
class. It will focus on understanding or consumption (less production)
of applied quantitative analysis for social
science. The goal is that you become a reasonably informed consumer of
basic quantitative information, and also that you will be able to
generate basic quantitative information.
Are you more of a researcher, data person, analytical mind? Then produce research in this class, eg use Excel, R, or Python.
Or are you more of a manager or consumer of research? then do literature review and critique others' research (which needs to do either way first)
Some research design and research process will be discussed as well.
We will go as slow as necessary, and try to have plenty of in-class
discussion, presentations, and will flip parts of some classes.
course objectives
review and critique academic research (done by others)
calculate basic statistics such as mean, median, and mode
understand research process
understand quantitative information; eg basic concepts of research design, descriptive and inferential statistics
understand graphs
required books
Wheelan Naked Statistics: Stripping the Dread from the Data 1st Edition
by Charles Wheelan; note: when i assign chapters, do read the appendices
Trochim http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/contents.php
bonus books for advanced users/math aficionados
OpenIntro
http://www.openintro.org/stat/textbook.php
4th ed
software
Unfortunately, none. BUT, you are encouraged to see me outside of the
class, where we can have a look at excel, stata, python, r, etc.
It is 21st century, and to produce research,
you really need to use a computer.
grading
problem sets 60% (6ps*10points)
(some of ps will be in-class presentation)
final presentation 30%
class participation/discussions [incl seeing me/emails say if you are shy] 10% [ updating the grade weekly or biweekly so you can track your progress and adjust]
min | max | grade |
90.0 | 100.0 | A |
85.0 | 89.9 | B+ |
80.0 | 84.9 | B |
75.0 | 79.9 | C+ |
70.0 | 74.9 | C |
0 | 69.9 | F |
academic calendar
tentative, most uptodate always on the class website: I work on those
materials continuously and they will be changing slightly
you may also want to see university calendar
you want to print several slides on one sheet, say 6
or just annotate electronic copy
[*] means bonus (extra/not required)
sep3 introduction to course and data: why research
methods?
[vid]
[v old vid]
[old vid]
go over the syllabus, briefly discuss basics of research methods
ps1.pdf
intro.pdf
res_des.pdf: intuition sec only [we'll
do everything in 2nd half of semester]
data basics and descriptive statistics
sep10 descriptive statistics 1: terminology and theory
[vid]
[v old vid]
[old vid]
we will dive into descriptive statistics and continue next week
ps2.pdf
des1.pdf
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/08/us/puerto-rico-hurricane-maria-death-toll.html: measurement is the key! GIGO! it is critical how you measure it; ideally do it in many ways, ie triangulate
Wheelan: Introduction, ch1-3
Trochim: Conceptualizing http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/resprob.php
Trochim: Unit of Analysis http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/unitanal.php
Trochim: Variables http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/variable.php
Trochim: Descriptive Statistics http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php
sep17 descriptive statistics 1-1: relationships in data
[vid]
[old vid]
DataBasics.pdf
des1-1.pdf (also spend like 30min on ps1, brainstorm, discuss)
hows ps2 going? doing calculations in excel or what?
Wheelan: ch4
Trochim: Types of Relationships http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/relation.php
[*] Trochim: Correlation http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statcorr.php
sep24 descriptive statistics 2: practicing, mostly
graphs
vid
[v old vid]
[old vid]
des2.pdf
quick discussion of ps2--anyone would like to present?
revisit anything, say hist/distr, crosstabs, scatterplots https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/correlation.html, q and a
btw, totally fine to change topic as you keep going, it evolves
(but change sooner than later; and less so later (more difficult and
costly for you));
great if you are finding sth unexpected
oct1 ps2 presentations 5min sharp, no more than 5, max 7
slides/displays; 5min discussion
vid
research design
ps3.pdf
go over general ps2 comments appended to ps2.pdf (specific comments in your canvas)
find research: overview and practice of google scholar
http://theaok.github.io/generic/howToGoogSch.html
[~1hr] and lets do some queries of your research
res_des.pdf
trochim: foundations and design
Wheelan ch7, 8
[*] Wheelan ch9,10
[*] trochim: measurement;
sampling
[*] trochim: Introduction to Evaluation http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intreval.php
[*] a fantastic webbook for research design (and methods, in
general): i encourage you to browse through it and read more than
just chapters specifically referred to here http://www.socialresearchmethods.net
oct15 more about research design and hypothesis
testing [old
vid]
vid
ps4.pdf [remember about ps3
]
revisit Google Scholar
continue with last weeks slides pick up with 'threats to internal validity'
flip the class: work on ps4, and possibly ps3
final_project.pdf [at
least skim through TOC]
Wheelan ch13, Conclusion
pick up with around slide 43 "discontinuity analysis (p.238 Wheelan, 2013)"
discuss Wheelan from last 2 weeks
rand_slides.pdf
: QOL in SJ: go quickly, skip bar charts showing
2000-10 chng; also drug abuse in
NJ: http://www.nj.gov/humanservices/dmhas/publications/statistical/Substance%20Abuse%20Overview/2015/statewide.pdf
note: p4 percents are column percents (sum up to 100 within
columns); a quick critique: just admission counts, but different county
pop, and many addicts not admitted
ex of succesful paper (papers used to
be required, now presentation only; still presentation will contain
similar key outputs, eg graphs, tables
(note: these ex took production route: produced
stats; again it is ok to just critique
research) paperExample1.pdf; paperExample2.pdf
2024 capstones nominated for
award capstone_1.pdf; capstone_2.pdf; capstone_3.pdf
if time: flip he class and work on ps3,4
oct29 presentations: ps3/ps4 5min per person (2-person group 7min) sharp! (i will cut you off)
vid
[old vid]
ps5.pdf
reg1.pdf, and will continue next week
continue with presentations: Tyler, Kiara, Tammy, Rich
[*] https://colab.research.google.com/github/theaok/vis/blob/main/resMet.ipynb
Wheelan ch11
nov12 continue with regression
[vid]
[old vid]
revisit Python notebook, and pick up with slide "predicted values (p200 Wheelan, 2013)"
City Life: Rankings (Livability) Versus Perceptions (Satisfaction): mostly fig, tab, essp rankings and corr
More
Unequal In Income, More Unequal in Wellbeing: fig1, tab1; tab2 and see Wheelan p33
alberto alesina: the more diversity, the less spending: see
regressions in "PUBLIC GOODS AND ETHNIC
DIVISIONS";
may also see (though not OLS but SUR): https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w10313/w10313.pdf and https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26620/w26620.pdf and https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1024471506938.pdf
I may post few more; let me know if you know of any good ones!
may reread Wheelan ch11
Wheelan ch12
flip the class work on ps5; anyone show what you have so far?; troubles frinding reg tables?
nov19 probability
[vid]
ps6.pdf
prob.pdf
Wheelan ch5-ch6
try to flip the last 20min or so: discussion, questions, work together on ps
nov26: no class : Change in Designation of Class Day--Observe THURSDAY schedule
dec3 final presentations: 11min (1 extra min v next wk) sharp! (and 15min discussion (3 extra min v next week))
vid
[old vid]
Make it legible! Make it as big as necessary for people to be able to see easily; dont go too fast, again max 1slide per minute
Most of the final presentation must be about *your* research either what you did or plan to do, not what others did.
Its about your research, not others!! Less about background and others, more about YOUR study; simplify and streamline! Do not put too many regressions by others in your final project!
Your project does not have to be fancy Python with huge raw datasets;
can be cross-tabs with data from published research, blogs, Wikipedia,
etc. But you need to do something new, creative, innovative, and be
rigorous; and have to use some concepts from the class; (again can be
just lit rev, but then synthesis (not just summary), comprehensive
and still do add value, eg extract best practices).
see sec
'examples' for examples of a perfect slide for presentation (just one slide, not whole presentation)
discussion of last 2 ps on probability and regression (generic
comments appended to ps pdf!); may
revisit reg1.pdf and prob.pdf
dec10 continue presentations 10min sharp (+12min discussion)
[old vid]
wrapUp.pdf if time: brief course summary
Wheelan ch12 and conclusion
[*] equality and equity: Brandi Blessett, Counternarratives as Critical Perspectives in Public Administration Curricula; Brandi Blessett, Social Equity in Public Administration: A Call to Action
ad:
https://theaok.github.io/vis/
rules
24fa NASPAA competency: To analyze, synthesize, think critically, solve problems and make decisions
do not share or link to class videos!
These videocasts and podcasts are the exclusive copyrighted property of Rutgers University and the Professor teaching the course. Rutgers University and the Professor grant you a license only to replay them for your own personal use during the course. Sharing them with others (including other students), reproducing, distributing, or posting any part of them elsewhere -- including but not limited to any internet site -- will be treated as a copyright violation and an offense against the honesty provisions of the Code of Student Conduct. Furthermore, for Law Students, this will be reported by the Law School to the licensing authorities in any jurisdiction in which you may apply to the bar.
doing research with humans and other animals
If you use data collected by someone else, you are fine. If you
collect your own data, do experiments, or in any way do anything with
human subjects or other animals, google 'rutgers irb'
confidential data
If you have, handle, or plan to use or collect any data that is in
any way confidential, eg: SSN, DOB, phone\#, address, name, etc: talk
to me first!
attendance
Attendance is mandatory: there will be quizzes and if you miss them,
you miss credit. You are
responsible for everything covered, including lecture, discussions,
announcements etc. Attendance is usually essential to learning. If you miss a
class, consult with a fellow student to learn what transpired.
incompletes: Like late problem sets, only allowed in documented
emergencies (eg hospitalization).
study groups. Many students over the years
have found the study groups to be very helpful. Study groups are permitted and encouraged to
work on the problem sets together. However, each individual student must write up his or her
own answer to hand in, based on his or her own understanding of the material. Do not hand in a
copy of another person's problem set, even a member of your own group. Writing up your own
answer helps you to internalize the group discussions and is a crucial
step in the learning process. Also, if worked in group, spell out
group members' names next to your name. You can work on problem sets
and on the presentation in a group of upto 3 people. So your group
would hand in one presentation, but each group member would hand in her own
problem set that must differ from others [except problem sets
that are drafts of final project; essp the later ones].
academic integrity. I am very serious about this. Make no
mistake--I may appear accommodating and informal--but I am extremely
strict about academic integrity. Violations of academic integrity include cheating on tests or handing in
assignments that do not reflect your own work and/or the work of a study group in which you
actively participated. Handing in your own work that was performed not
for this class (eg other class, any other project) is cheating,
too. I have a policy of zero tolerance for cheating. Violations will be referred
to the appropriate university authorities.
For more information see http://fas.camden.rutgers.edu/student-experience/academic-integrity-policy
accommodating students with disabilities.
Any student with a disability affecting performance in the class
should contact the disability office ASAP: google 'rutgers camden
disability office'
civic engagement component (opportunity for extra credit!)
Start early. Start thinking about how you want to engage civically
today.
Note: if you are from far away, say North Jersey, let me know as you
will be at some disadvantage, eg won't be able to take advantage of
labs. And let's plan how we can make sure you can succeed in this class!
typical civic engagement
Universities and social science should serve society.
You are encouraged have to engage with local community.
The idea is that you engage civically using research methods. There are several
ways to do it. Ideally, you will partner with a local organization,
obtain data from them, do some analysis, and present results to them. You may also use government data, say from census bureau, and present relevant
information to locals. A local organization can be Rutgers research
institute such as WRI, CURE, LEAP or any other organization such as
school or soup kitchen or CamConnect. Rutgers Office of civic
engagement may be able to help
you contact them. The key idea is partnership: you will use tools
from this class to produce output useful to local community. This
is similar to taking a role of an apprentice at a local organization
or serving as a consultant.
Using
real world data poses challenges, which is a part of
exercise. Presenting your findings to stakeholders outside of a class
is also challenging. At the same time, it is fairly easy to contribute
locally by using simple tools learned in this class. For instance,
simple comparison of means between two schools in Camden can be
revealing and helpful locally.
An obvious way would be to use data at your workplace or at a
workplace of someone you know. However, you need to make sure that it
serves society in some way. For instance, it would be straightforward
if you work at a hospital or school or fire department; but it would
be difficult if you work at Starbucks.
For instance, to give just one example, in the past some
students worked for local schools and they obtained some data from
Camden City Board of Education, and they simply interpreted those data
and drew some conclusions. The idea is to evaluate the data more
broadly and interpret it in a helpful and creative way, ideally
connect to the literature and arrive at some conclusions that will
help with the school operation.
Some specific ideas: hopeworks, salvation army, and PBCIP.org
atypical civic engagement--CONTACT ME FIRST if you consider this!
Successful completion of atypical civic engagement will take estimated at
least double of the typical civic engagement time.
You could try to engage at regional or State level-for
instance, you may evaluate some policy in NJ as compared to NY, or
produce descriptive statistics of a region that would be useful
regionally (eg my South Jersey WRI paper
http://dept.camden.rutgers.edu/rand-institute/files/changes-across-the-region.pdf
Such type of engagement typically requires substantial research
experience typically found at late stage of PhD program.
There may also be some other atypical ways-let me know your ideas.